|
Notice of Vote and Comment Deadline for Consensus Document
(H18-A3) Handling and Processing of Blood Specimens
NCCLS announces that the following documents are submitted for vote as candidate-for-advancement consensus documents.
The documents and ballots are posted on NCCLS Forums to delegates of Active and Associate Active member organizations. If you are a voting delegate or alternate, we request that you access NCCLS Forums to obtain the candidate-for-advancement documents. Login to access NCCLS Forums
The deadline for the completed ballot for H18-A3 to be received in the Executive Offices is 6 July 2004.
H18-A3 — Procedures for the Handling and Processing of Blood Specimens; Approved Guideline—Third Edition
This document includes criteria for preparing an optimal serum or plasma sample and for the devices used to process blood specimens.
-Second Notice-
The deadline for the completed ballot for EP5-A2 to be received in the Executive Offices is 7 June 2004.
EP5-A2 — Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Methods; Approved Guideline—Second Edition
This document provides guidance for designing an experiment to evaluate the precision performance of quantitative methods; recommendations on comparing the resulting precision estimates with manufacturers’ precision performance claims and determining when such comparisons are valid; as well as manufacturers’ guidelines for establishing claims.
Under our Administrative Procedures, an NCCLS document approved by the area committee at the first level of the consensus process is submitted to the NCCLS delegates as a “candidate-for-advancement” consensus document. This begins the voting and approval period by the delegates.
As a delegate, your vote is to affirm (or reject) the document for advancement as an NCCLS document. Please send your completed ballot to the Executive Offices by the above deadline.
In the NCCLS consensus process, comments are invited at each publication stage. In each edition, the responsible committee includes a summary of comments on the prior edition and its responses to them. Any comments received on a candidate-for-advancement consensus document as a result of delegate voting and consensus review will be addressed by the committee during the document’s advancement.
For more information on Active and Associate Active membership, click here.
[
return to top ]
|
